408 resources found

This document details methods for integrating grizzly bear habitat conservation with commercial logging objectives in the Coastal Western Hemlock zone of British Columbia, where rich timberland overlaps with crucial bear foraging areas. The primary goal is to provide silviculture guidelines that allow managers to maintain commercially viable stands while enhancing the abundance of bear forage throughout the forest rotation. Key strategies involve manipulating stand density and canopy closure through techniques like cluster planting and spacing, creating light gaps sufficient for understory food plants to thrive. The implementation of these standards requires application at multiple planning levels and relies heavily on a continuous adaptive management approach for monitoring effectiveness and refining prescriptions over time.

This webinar outlines a successful ten-year effort to refine reforestation techniques using post-harvest slash burning in Minnesota after a large-scale jack pine budworm salvage operation. While initial attempts tried to use fire and direct seeding for complete restoration, the team discovered that the prescribed burns were most effective when used as a tool for controlling aggressive woody competition like aspen. Experience taught the team that achieving deep root-kill and effective brush control depends on conducting burns during late summer dry soil conditions, which is crucial for maximizing intensity. The resulting methodology integrates fire as a hybrid replacement for chemical herbicide application, successfully preparing sites for planting and promoting the establishment of diverse jack pine stands.

This webinar discusses operationalizing adaptive silviculture for climate change through a multi-site research network. The core purpose of the project is to provide forest managers with real-world, operational examples of integrating climate change adaptation principles into practice, specifically by fostering ecosystem resilience to uncertain futures. The research employs a consistent framework across various forest types, testing three primary adaptation strategies including resistance, resilience, and transition. The webinar details the work at the Minnesota pine site, highlighting local climate vulnerability to drought and the application of these three treatments: simple thinning for resistance, mixed-species restoration for resilience, and aggressive transition management using both native and novel, future-adapted species like Ponderosa pine.

This webinar focused on adapting timber management practices to environmental shifts. The webinar establishes the urgent need for adaptation by detailing regional climate projections, including rising temperatures and increased summer drought frequency, which pose significant threats to traditionally managed commercial species like Red Pine. The framework consisting of Resistance, Resilience, and Transition strategies is introduced, demonstrating how varying levels of silvicultural intervention, from thinning to mitigate drought to planting novel species via assisted migration, can reduce climate vulnerability. The central purpose of the discussion is to convince land managers that they can implement these science-backed silvicultural actions to sustain forest productivity and commercial value despite increasing ecological risks.

This webianr explored the use of biochar as a promising but highly variable soil amendment intended to enhance forest climate resilience, focusing on its potential for increased water holding capacity and long-term carbon storage. Lead researcher, Marcelo Windmuller-Campione, detailed multiple collaborative studies, primarily testing biochara?Ts effectiveness on Jack Pine survival and growth in Minnesota's porous, sandy soils. While initial benefits were sometimes observed in early field trials, long-term data and controlled experiments indicated that the biochar provided no significant or lasting improvement compared to control groups. The research concluded that while biochar presents a viable carbon storage strategy, its operational feasibility and ecological benefits are severely limited when applied to highly porous forest ecosystems.

This webinar details the core concepts of silvicultural systems, which are comprehensive approaches to forest management defined by three continuous elements: regeneration, tending, and harvesting. These systems are structured along a practical spectrum of harvest intensity, starting with low-disturbance selection methods suitable for shade-tolerant species and culminating in high-intensity treatments like clearcutting, which favor light-demanding species. The choice of technique, such as the multi-step shelterwood method or the more localized seed tree method, depends entirely on the desired future condition of the stand and the ecology of the target tree species. Successful silviculture is presented as both a science and an art, requiring creative application of various treatments, including intermediate thinning, to achieve specific outcomes.

This webinar argues that managing the escalating crisis of high-severity Canadian wildfires requires a move beyond traditional fire suppression toward proactive fuel management. The key is to apply a strategic risk framework that prioritizes efforts based on both fire probability and the immense consequence to critical values at risk, such as vital infrastructure, vulnerable communities, and watersheds. Effective mitigation must combine mandated land-use regulations, such as strict FireSmart building standards, with a significant increase in landscape-level fuel treatments, including prescribed burning. The webinar discusses that achieving long-term success necessitates a fundamental reworking of the existing forest management framework in British Columbia to adequately integrate fire resilience and prevention.

This webinar introduces a new approach to managing the forest-based bioeconomy by challenging the assumptions about biomass supply availability for emerging industries. Dr. Greg Parody details his work on developing integrated open-source modeling frameworks, such as the Candies project, which link robust forest estate models with spatial ecological simulations to move beyond isolated planning. The core objective is advancing open modeling for cumulative effects by including industrial supply chain behavior, ensuring that Annual Allowable Cut projections are grounded in market realities and logistics. The work demonstrates that evaluating the sustainability of forest activities, particularly regarding climate change mitigation, depends entirely on what happens to the logs afterward and the subsequent displacement of other materials.

This document details the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems study, which investigated various forest harvesting methods to find ecologically sound alternatives to traditional clearcutting practices in high-elevation coastal forests. The seven-year results demonstrated that the fastest volume growth for regenerating western hemlock and amabilis fir occurred in the treatments with the least retained overstory, such as the clearcut and patch cut systems. The study also emphasized that effective control of competing vegetation is vital for successful seedling performance, noting that herbicide use yielded significantly better growth than manual clearing. The data suggested that silvicultural systems retaining a significant canopy might reduce long-term tree growth due to increased competition and lower light levels.

This technical report details the outcomes of the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems study, which was prompted by operational concerns about forest regeneration and public pressure to limit clearcutting in high-elevation coastal regions of British Columbia. The core objective was to compare the operational productivity and financial viability of three alternative harvesting techniques including uniform shelterwood, green tree retention, and patch cutting against a conventional clearcut. The findings indicated that while these innovative systems could be applied successfully on gentle terrain, they resulted in significantly higher harvesting costs, with the shelterwood system proving to be 38% more expensive than clearcutting. The report also examined the acceptable low levels of site disturbance and soil compaction caused by the machinery, confirming that long-term success will rely on future monitoring of windthrow occurrence and regeneration success.

This guidance document establishes mandated procedures for incorporating biological diversity conservation into the practice of juvenile spacing within young managed forests. The document defines biodiversity broadly and outlines a crucial two-tiered management structure: the Landscape Level, which involves large-scale planning using habitat corridors like Forest Ecosystem Networks, and the Stand Level, which dictates the retention of local attributes such as snags, riparian zones, and varied tree species. To ensure compliance, the guidelines provide specific instructions for identifying habitat features, timing operations, and drafting detailed contract clauses, often outlining species-specific requirements for animals like bears and moose. This framework ensures that the economic goals of timber production are executed in a way that is compatible with ecological objectives to sustain the unique variety of life found in British Columbiaa?Ts forests.

The Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems trial was designed to compare the ecological effects of traditional clearcutting against alternative silvicultural systems regarding forest nutrient dynamics in coastal British Columbia. Researchers observed that while harvesting led to a slight, short-lived increase in soil nitrogen availability, the resulting fluxes of nitrogen below the rooting zone were negligible. A key finding was that mineralized nitrogen remained predominantly in the form of ammonium, and subsequent nitrate increases were primarily due to decreased microbial consumption rather than increased production. The study concluded that since the estimated nitrogen losses from the rooting zone were minimal compared to vast soil reserves and natural atmospheric inputs, harvesting is unlikely to negatively impact future site productivity.

This report details the 26-year results of the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems Project, an integrated, long-term study designed to evaluate the biological consequences of different harvesting approaches in montane coastal forests of British Columbia. Researchers quantified changes in understory vegetation cover, diversity, and conifer regeneration across four systems, including clearcutting and various forms of tree retention, compared to an old-growth benchmark. The study found that while all harvesting methods led to an eventual increase in overall species richness, the uniform shelterwood retained more stand structure and pre-harvest plant species initially. The findings suggest that the retention of relatively intact mature forest patches is the most effective approach for conserving plant and non-vascular species associated with older forests.

This research documents a six-year monitoring study at the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems site, examining how different harvesting methods influence the likelihood of windthrow damage in coastal montane forests. The study quantified stem loss across four treatments, including clearcut, shelterwood, green tree retention, and patch cut, finding that windthrow losses were substantial across the site, which was not initially considered high risk. Although low-density green tree retention experienced the highest proportion of damaged trees, the overall greatest number of wind-damaged stems occurred in the shelterwood treatment. The data indicates that small, concentrated patch cuts resulted in the lowest amount of windthrow, suggesting that grouped retention is a more effective strategy than dispersed retention for minimizing wind damage. The authors conclude that adopting group retention strategies can better conserve structural forest elements while addressing challenges related to windthrow risk.

This document on the 26-year assessment of the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems evaluates the success of planted Amabilis fir and Western Hemlock seedlings established in 1994. The core purpose of the MASS study is to measure the impact of four distinct establishment treatments, including control, fertilization, herbicide, or a combination, on tree growth over time. These treated plots are systematically mapped within the context of various silvicultural harvesting systems, including clearcut, green tree, patch cut, and shelterwood. The images act as an inventory, identifying the specific plot numbers selected for the 2019 photographic evaluation of the long-term experimental outcomes within each system.

This document on the 26-year assessment of the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems study focuses on natural regeneration and understory species within various managed forest environments. The MASS study is highly structured, comparing distinct silvicultural systems such as clearcut, shelterwood, and old growth by utilizing three separate replicates for each treatment type. Data collection relies on establishing Permanent Vegetation Plots, which incorporate smaller, precisely defined nested sub-plots to monitor detailed plant life, including herbs, bryophytes, and tagged conifer species like Amabilis fir and Western Hemlock. These images function as a structured index, associating specific plot and photo numbers with each experimental manipulation across the research site.

This comprehensive 15-year report details the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems Project, which tested the efficacy of different harvesting treatments, including clearcutting, patch cutting, and various forms of retention, on forest health and regeneration in coastal British Columbia. Key findings reveal that while conifer survival remained consistent across treatments, tree height and volume growth was generally slower in the shelterwood environment due to reduced light, and the single most effective way to boost planted tree growth was through intensive vegetation control. Conversely, the shelterwood system successfully maintained the greatest understory species diversity and composition most similar to the uncut old-growth forest, minimizing the loss of shade-loving plants. The long-term data emphasizes a crucial trade-off: maximizing early conifer growth favors more open treatments, but retaining pre-harvest biodiversity values is best achieved with substantial canopy protection.

The Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems project is a 25-year study designed to evaluate how different harvesting methods impact regeneration, wildlife habitat, and aesthetics at high elevations on Vancouver Island. This research compared standard clearcutting with three alternative silvicultural systems including patch cut, green tree, and shelterwood, while tracking the growth and survival of five conifer species. The findings revealed that planted Douglas-fir was the fastest growing species across all treatments, despite experiencing the highest rate of mortality. The research also confirmed that post-planting efforts such as vegetation control significantly improved the volume and growth of species like western hemlock and amabilis fir over the long term.

This study, conducted at the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems site, investigated the phenomenon of growth check in young amabilis fir trees, characterized by a sharp decline in annual height increment approximately ten years after planting. Researchers hypothesized that this severe growth limitation was linked to aggressive competition from ericaceous shrubs, such as Vaccinium species, resulting in limited nutrient availability, particularly nitrogen deficiency. By comparing different harvest treatments and the use of early herbicide treatment, the study concluded that vegetation control was the most significant factor in maintaining growth - trees without herbicide were often severely stunted and exhibited greater Vaccinium cover. The findings establish that high shrub competition coupled with low foliar nitrogen are reliable indicators for diagnosing and predicting this critical growth failure on coastal montane sites.

This report outlines the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems study, a large-scale project designed to test the ecological and operational feasibility of harvest methods beyond conventional clearcutting in coastal British Columbia montane forests. The research examined the biological and silvicultural impacts of four systems, including clearcut, patch cuts, green tree retention, and shelterwood, to address concerns regarding regeneration, aesthetics, and biodiversity in challenging high-elevation environments. Key findings indicated that while clearcutting was often the most cost-effective, alternative systems faced specific issues, such as increased operational costs and shade limitations that suppressed seedling growth in the shelterwood treatments. The results offer actionable implications, suggesting that small patch cuts and low retention levels can be successfully implemented without significantly reducing early plantation performance.