This paper investigates the interplay between future wildfire risk and the greenhouse gas mitigation potential of rehabilitating forests in British Columbia, Canada. Using modeling that simulates future fire scenarios and tracks carbon in forests and harvested wood products, the study assesses whether post-fire salvage logging and replanting can lead to a net reduction in GHG emissions compared to natural regeneration. The authors explore the conditions under which these rehabilitation efforts yield climate benefits and compare this potential mitigation against the substantial GHG emissions from the projected increase in wildfires, questioning if resources might be better directed towards preventing fires in the first place.
