This paper synthesizes the disparate groundwater responses to wildfire, noting that post-fire effects range from significant increases to decreases in water fluxes like recharge and baseflow. The authors evaluate this variability across five primary ...
This paper synthesizes the disparate groundwater responses to wildfire, noting that post-fire effects range from significant increases to decreases in water fluxes like recharge and baseflow. The authors evaluate this variability across five primary categories: climate, vegetation, hydrogeology, fire characteristics, and the cryosphere, focusing on both short-term and intermediate recovery periods. A critical finding is that post-wildfire responses often align with hydroclimatic settings where water input and evaporative demand are out of sync, while the pre-wildfire groundwater regime significantly influences the expected outcome and recovery trajectory. This paper provides a collection of testable hypotheses and identifies key areas, particularly the influence of snow dynamics and cryospheric processes, for future monitoring and modeling efforts to improve the prediction of groundwater recovery after fires.
