41 resources found

This document details a research project in British Columbia testing various silvicultural systems beyond traditional clearcutting to manage forests for multiple values, not just timber. The study evaluated the costs, productivity, tree damage, and soil disturbance associated with different harvesting methods used in the first phase of the project. The findings highlight the trade-offs between different approaches, noting that methods like clearcutting were most cost-effective for harvesting, while alternative systems resulted in varying levels of tree damage and soil disturbance.

This document outlines the principles and specific strategies guiding forest management within the Aleza Lake Research Forest. It's structured into key sections covering silvicultural practices, goals, and standards, emphasizing a balanced approach to timber production, ecological values, research, and education. The document details aspects like reforestation methods, species selection, rotation lengths, and management of competing vegetation, all while considering climate change adaptation and forest health. This document serves as a comprehensive guide for ensuring sustainable and diverse forest management on the ALRF landbase, aligning with both provincial regulations and the unique objectives of a research and demonstration forest.

This extension note investigates the effects of different site preparation methods on a high-elevation wet, cold forest in British Columbia. The study examines the initial responses of planted and natural tree regeneration, soil properties, vegetation, and biodiversity to these treatments within various harvesting systems. The report aims to provide guidance for operational decisions regarding site preparation in these challenging environments, considering both silvicultural success and broader ecological impacts.

This document summarizes the early findings of a multidisciplinary study in Washington's Capitol Forest, which evaluates six different silvicultural regimes ranging from traditional clearcutting to group selection and untreated controls on an operational scale. By managing young-growth Douglas-fir stands for multiple objectives, researchers aim to provide forest managers with quantitative data on the biological, financial, and social consequences of various timber harvest patterns. Key themes include the comparative costs and feasibility of implementing these systems, the physical impact on soil and regeneration, and the public's aesthetic response to different landscape conditions. This study seeks to identify management options that can sustain high timber yields while simultaneously enhancing wildlife habitat and visual appeal to meet modern societal expectations.

This extension note outlines long-term research at the Opax Mountain and Isobel sites in British Columbia, focusing on sustainable management for Interior Douglas-fir ecosystems. By evaluating various harvesting intensities and patterns, researchers are investigating how different silvicultural methods impact timber yields, biodiversity, and forage productivity. The studies emphasize that a diverse mosaic of treatments is necessary to satisfy competing ecological and social values, as uniform practices fail to support all forest functions. This document provides forest managers with technical guidance and modeling tools to maintain healthy, open-canopy forests while balancing the needs of the timber industry and the environment.

This document outlines a comprehensive long-term forestry study located near Campbell River, British Columbia, designed to evaluate alternatives to clearcut harvesting in mature second-growth forests. The research compares seven distinct silvicultural systems, ranging from traditional clearcutting to more complex methods like aggregated retention and group selection, to determine their impact on forest resilience and biodiversity. By tracking variables such as timber productivity, harvesting costs, and ecological regeneration, the study aims to identify management strategies that balance economic demands with the preservation of ecosystem services in the face of climate change. Detailed assessments of soil disturbance, vegetation shifts, and tree growth serve as a vital demonstration and experimental resource for foresters and scientists seeking to maintain healthy, multi-use forest landscapes.

This LMH Document #79 outlines the principles and best practices for silvicultural systems in British Columbia, emphasizing a shift toward complex, multi-value forest management in the 21st century. Its primary purpose is to serve as a central reference and conceptual framework for forest professionals to design and implement silvicultural plans that move a stand from its current state to a desired future condition through planned interventions, known as stand development pathways. A crucial and recurring theme is the growing role of First Nations, including their traditional knowledge, values, and stewardship goals, which are integrated alongside ecological, social, and economic objectives. The document provides detailed guidance on technical aspects, such as managing for biodiversity, mitigating risks like windthrow and pests, and utilizing adaptive management for continuous improvement in forestry practices.

This FRDA Report #247 details a study comparing different methods of harvesting trees in a coastal montane forest in British Columbia. Prompted by concerns about regeneration success at higher elevations and public desire for alternatives to clearcutting, the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems project investigated the productivity and costs associated with uniform shelterwood, green tree retention, and patch cutting compared to traditional clearcutting. The study tracked the efficiency and expense of falling and forwarding operations, alongside measuring the impact on soil disturbance and the amount of remaining woody debris. Ultimately, the research aimed to provide insights into the economic and operational feasibility of alternative silvicultural systems in this challenging environment, while also considering their long-term ecological effects.

This study documents the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems project, a long-term cooperative study on Vancouver Island, British Columbia, established to find forest management practices that could replace conventional clearcutting in high-elevation coastal environments. This research initiative evaluated the operational, economic, and biological consequences of alternatives like patch cuts, green tree retention, and shelterwood logging. The findings cover crucial metrics such as operational costs and feasibility, as well as detailed ecological and silvicultural impacts on forest regeneration, soil health, and local biodiversity. The purpose of the MASS research was to provide the scientific foundation needed for implementing environmentally sustainable harvesting systems, such as variable retention, in the region's complex montane forests.

This document outlines the critical need to braid Indigenous Knowledge and Western Science to create climate-adapted forests in the United States. A primary theme is the historical impact of Euro-American colonization, fire exclusion, and settler colonialism on North American forest ecosystems, leading to the loss of Indigenous stewardship and creating dense, fire-maladapted landscapes highly vulnerable to severe wildfires and climate change stressors. The text defines IK as an invaluable, multi-generational body of systemic knowledge and cultural practices emphasizing kinship with nature and reciprocity, contrasting it with the empirical and objective approach of WS.

This document details the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems study, which investigated various forest harvesting methods to find ecologically sound alternatives to traditional clearcutting practices in high-elevation coastal forests. The seven-year results demonstrated that the fastest volume growth for regenerating western hemlock and amabilis fir occurred in the treatments with the least retained overstory, such as the clearcut and patch cut systems. The study also emphasized that effective control of competing vegetation is vital for successful seedling performance, noting that herbicide use yielded significantly better growth than manual clearing. The data suggested that silvicultural systems retaining a significant canopy might reduce long-term tree growth due to increased competition and lower light levels.

This technical report details the outcomes of the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems study, which was prompted by operational concerns about forest regeneration and public pressure to limit clearcutting in high-elevation coastal regions of British Columbia. The core objective was to compare the operational productivity and financial viability of three alternative harvesting techniques including uniform shelterwood, green tree retention, and patch cutting against a conventional clearcut. The findings indicated that while these innovative systems could be applied successfully on gentle terrain, they resulted in significantly higher harvesting costs, with the shelterwood system proving to be 38% more expensive than clearcutting. The report also examined the acceptable low levels of site disturbance and soil compaction caused by the machinery, confirming that long-term success will rely on future monitoring of windthrow occurrence and regeneration success.

The Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems trial was designed to compare the ecological effects of traditional clearcutting against alternative silvicultural systems regarding forest nutrient dynamics in coastal British Columbia. Researchers observed that while harvesting led to a slight, short-lived increase in soil nitrogen availability, the resulting fluxes of nitrogen below the rooting zone were negligible. A key finding was that mineralized nitrogen remained predominantly in the form of ammonium, and subsequent nitrate increases were primarily due to decreased microbial consumption rather than increased production. The study concluded that since the estimated nitrogen losses from the rooting zone were minimal compared to vast soil reserves and natural atmospheric inputs, harvesting is unlikely to negatively impact future site productivity.

This research documents a six-year monitoring study at the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems site, examining how different harvesting methods influence the likelihood of windthrow damage in coastal montane forests. The study quantified stem loss across four treatments, including clearcut, shelterwood, green tree retention, and patch cut, finding that windthrow losses were substantial across the site, which was not initially considered high risk. Although low-density green tree retention experienced the highest proportion of damaged trees, the overall greatest number of wind-damaged stems occurred in the shelterwood treatment. The data indicates that small, concentrated patch cuts resulted in the lowest amount of windthrow, suggesting that grouped retention is a more effective strategy than dispersed retention for minimizing wind damage. The authors conclude that adopting group retention strategies can better conserve structural forest elements while addressing challenges related to windthrow risk.

This document on the 26-year assessment of the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems evaluates the success of planted Amabilis fir and Western Hemlock seedlings established in 1994. The core purpose of the MASS study is to measure the impact of four distinct establishment treatments, including control, fertilization, herbicide, or a combination, on tree growth over time. These treated plots are systematically mapped within the context of various silvicultural harvesting systems, including clearcut, green tree, patch cut, and shelterwood. The images act as an inventory, identifying the specific plot numbers selected for the 2019 photographic evaluation of the long-term experimental outcomes within each system.

This document on the 26-year assessment of the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems study focuses on natural regeneration and understory species within various managed forest environments. The MASS study is highly structured, comparing distinct silvicultural systems such as clearcut, shelterwood, and old growth by utilizing three separate replicates for each treatment type. Data collection relies on establishing Permanent Vegetation Plots, which incorporate smaller, precisely defined nested sub-plots to monitor detailed plant life, including herbs, bryophytes, and tagged conifer species like Amabilis fir and Western Hemlock. These images function as a structured index, associating specific plot and photo numbers with each experimental manipulation across the research site.

This comprehensive 15-year report details the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems Project, which tested the efficacy of different harvesting treatments, including clearcutting, patch cutting, and various forms of retention, on forest health and regeneration in coastal British Columbia. Key findings reveal that while conifer survival remained consistent across treatments, tree height and volume growth was generally slower in the shelterwood environment due to reduced light, and the single most effective way to boost planted tree growth was through intensive vegetation control. Conversely, the shelterwood system successfully maintained the greatest understory species diversity and composition most similar to the uncut old-growth forest, minimizing the loss of shade-loving plants. The long-term data emphasizes a crucial trade-off: maximizing early conifer growth favors more open treatments, but retaining pre-harvest biodiversity values is best achieved with substantial canopy protection.

The Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems project is a 25-year study designed to evaluate how different harvesting methods impact regeneration, wildlife habitat, and aesthetics at high elevations on Vancouver Island. This research compared standard clearcutting with three alternative silvicultural systems including patch cut, green tree, and shelterwood, while tracking the growth and survival of five conifer species. The findings revealed that planted Douglas-fir was the fastest growing species across all treatments, despite experiencing the highest rate of mortality. The research also confirmed that post-planting efforts such as vegetation control significantly improved the volume and growth of species like western hemlock and amabilis fir over the long term.

This study, conducted at the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems site, investigated the phenomenon of growth check in young amabilis fir trees, characterized by a sharp decline in annual height increment approximately ten years after planting. Researchers hypothesized that this severe growth limitation was linked to aggressive competition from ericaceous shrubs, such as Vaccinium species, resulting in limited nutrient availability, particularly nitrogen deficiency. By comparing different harvest treatments and the use of early herbicide treatment, the study concluded that vegetation control was the most significant factor in maintaining growth - trees without herbicide were often severely stunted and exhibited greater Vaccinium cover. The findings establish that high shrub competition coupled with low foliar nitrogen are reliable indicators for diagnosing and predicting this critical growth failure on coastal montane sites.

This report outlines the Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems study, a large-scale project designed to test the ecological and operational feasibility of harvest methods beyond conventional clearcutting in coastal British Columbia montane forests. The research examined the biological and silvicultural impacts of four systems, including clearcut, patch cuts, green tree retention, and shelterwood, to address concerns regarding regeneration, aesthetics, and biodiversity in challenging high-elevation environments. Key findings indicated that while clearcutting was often the most cost-effective, alternative systems faced specific issues, such as increased operational costs and shade limitations that suppressed seedling growth in the shelterwood treatments. The results offer actionable implications, suggesting that small patch cuts and low retention levels can be successfully implemented without significantly reducing early plantation performance.